Without millions and billions of years, evolutionary history completely falls apart. Here is the first of many credible articles from various branches of science that tell of a world much younger than evolutionists claim.
Evidence 1 Geology: Radiocarbon in Diamonds and Coal
Far from proving evolution, carbon-14 dating actually provides some of the strongest evidence for creation and a young earth. Radiocarbon (carbon-14) cannot remain naturally in substances for millions of years because it decays relatively rapidly. For this reason, it can only be used to obtain “ages” in the range of tens of thousands of years.
Scientists from the RATE (Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth) project examined diamonds that evolutionists consider to be 1–2 billion years old and related to the earth’s early history. Diamonds are the hardest known substance and extremely resistant to contamination through chemical exchange.
Yet the RATE scientists discovered significant detectable levels of radiocarbon in these diamonds, dating them at around 55,000 years—a far cry from the evolutionary billions!
In addition, samples were then taken from ten different coal layers that, according to evolutionists, dated millions to hundreds of millions of years old based on standard evolution time estimates, all contained measurable amounts of 14C. Samples displayed significant amounts of 14C. This is a significant discovery. Since the half-life of 14C is relatively short (5,730 years), there should be no detectable 14C left after about 100,000 years. The average 14C estimated age for all the layers from these three time periods was approximately 50,000 years. However, using a more realistic Pre-Flood 14C /12C ratio reduces that age to about 5,000 years.
Conclusion
All radiometric dating methods are based on assumptions about events that happened in the past. If the assumptions are accepted as true (as is typically done in the evolutionary dating processes), results can be biased toward a desired age. In the reported ages given in textbooks and other journals, these evolutionary assumptions have not been questioned, while results inconsistent with long ages have been censored. When the assumptions were evaluated and shown faulty, the results supported the biblical account of a global Flood and young earth. Christians should not be afraid of radiometric dating methods. Carbon-14 dating is really the friend of Christians, and it supports a young earth.
Sources:
http://christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c007.html
https://answersingenesis.org/geology/carbon-14/doesnt-carbon-14-dating-disprove-the-bible/
https://answersingenesis.org/geology/carbon-14/radiocarbon-in-diamonds-confirmed/
Ray R Barmore
Health and Wellness Coach
The Herbal Guy
San Diego California
Skype: barmore4
Email Me
Other Blog:
Health and Nutrition
Websites:
Markethive
Inbound Marketing
Melaleuca
Winning at Sports Betting
Lose weight with Venus Factor
